I feel that the 103 is one of the worst mics Neumann has made. which one is better for male rap vocals? For what it's worth, I made the same choice as Jeff. It includes some of the same features, like the frequency range, very low noise of operation, and the cardioid pickup pattern. Hence, Neumann TLM 102 can be a more portable mic that is easy to handle. Though, this is hardly surprising, as Neumann are known for having some of the best quality control and manufacturing in the audio world. Hi do you like the tlm 103 better or the tlm 102 better? MPC Live vs. AKAI Force: How Do They Compare? We all had to start somewhere! What is the difference other than the obvious price tag??? 102 is great for guitars, acoustic guitars and strings. Neumann TLM 102 vs. Neumann TLM 103 vs. AKG C 414. It is suitable for studio projects, broadcasters, and voiceover artists. Which one sounds clearer, on high end and low end ect. we can start an internet myth that the vintage tubes in old CRT screens just make the audio you are looking at sound so much warmer and better. tlm 102 or 103. 102 has a slight edge in portability for live shows and concert applications but really both models were made with this in mind and consideration. Can you explain why because i'm planning on buying a mic soon. As the effect, this mic is great for loud and powerful singers. I am also interested in the OP's question. Go and try them out at a shop, choose the one you like better But also great for vocalists as well. That was a long time ago,2012.I did like the 102.It was more forgiving than the 103 but had no use for a mic like that. 103 has a larger diaphragm. But I have no complaints on either and would use either for that purpose without hesitation. Some prefer the brighter top end quality of the 103 while others say the top end sounds harsh on the 103. Tracked with either the Grace or the Great River for a pre. 103 is heavier. Tags: akg; c414; ... 1000$ to spend and I am looking for the best mic. Neumann TLM 103 Vs 102. Ironically... a lot of the chart topping hits that have claims of being done on a laptop and a $99 mic are usually redone in a professional studio before being released. What was your opinion after having the 102 a couple days? Did some tracking through a comp, but not all. I've used both extensively. 103 is physically heavier (210g vs 450g), has a bit brighter top end, has less noise (about 4dB difference), but 102 has better THD ratio (144dB vs 138dB), but in the end the differences between those two microphones still affect the quality of your recording way less than the change of performer or sound source. When choosing between Neumann TLM 102 vs 103, note that they have different sound characteristics. I’ve seen and heard people say that the 102 is more natural sounding. In a way, the TLM 102 is an affordable alternative to the 103. Neumann KH 120 vs Adam A7X: Which Is The Better Option For You? Included Accessories: Stand Mount, Wood Box. Both are great microphones and produce a lively sound quality in a condenser mic for digital recording. The 102 was much more natural sounding and the high end was detailed and clear without being too bright. Hello! Both are great mics in their price range and both will shine on the right voice. On the other hand, if you are a seasoned pro, please don't hesitate to jump in and offer your experience and wisdom. We keep an old 103 permanently mounted on the 2nd boom of our voice booth..it's been in the booth for 13 years so that says something about it's usefulness. Its pristine, clear sound is a modern update on the classic U87. On the other hand, Neumann … 102 sounds flatter with more of a focus on midrange frequencies. The high end on it is pretty harsh in my opinion. I didn't spend weeks trying to EQ them to see if I could get them right, but did lots and lots of takes with vocals, and some with acoustic guitar.